A resource collection
by Miguel Guhlin

NSPA 2026 · October 21 · 3:30–5:00 PM CT

Trust, Transparency,
and AI

Building Responsible Scholarship Review Practices

Build a review prompt, map a protected workflow, and draft a fair approach to applicant AI use.

Present the webdeck →Open the practice lab →My capacity matrix →
AI-generated concept illustration: two scholarship reviewers examine evidence together, with a transparent shield and a path to an open door representing trust, human oversight, and opportunity.
The 90-minute workshop agenda
Time (CT)FocusWhat you make
3:30–3:38
8 min		Frame the decisionsIdentify one review task and rate a starting capacity.
3:38–3:50
12 min		Build a structured promptDraft a constrained prompt with an evidence requirement.
3:50–4:05
15 min		Demonstrate administrative reviewTest synthetic application triage; catch omissions and unsupported claims.
4:05–4:20
15 min		Calibrate a review rubricCompare independent human ratings before seeing an AI draft.
4:20–4:30
10 min		Protect the workflowPlace a data gate and a named human decision owner in a workflow.
4:30–4:45
15 min		Evaluate applicant AI useInterpret a detector signal; draft a fair policy response.
4:45–4:55
10 min		Choose a capacity targetSelect one capacity, evidence of progress, and a 30-day action.
4:55–5:00
5 min		Commit and closeShare an exit ticket and address remaining questions.

Use during the session. Keep afterward.

Your workshop materials

ZIPComplete offline workshopExtract the ZIP, then open index.html; no internet requiredDOCXSession takeawaysKey points in the NSPA takeaway templatePDFPrintable takeawaysTwo-page session referenceWEBWebdeckPresent online with clickable resources and notesPPTXPresentationPowerPoint with speaker notesPDFPresentation PDFEasy viewing and sharingZIPIndividual slide images26 numbered slide PNGsPDFParticipant workbookSynthetic packet, rubric, policy lab, and action planPDFFacilitator guideWhat to say, activity directions, and demo fallbackPDFPrompt & rubric referenceStructure the request and verify the resultPDFProtected workflow referencePlace data approval and human review gatesPDFFair applicant AI-use referenceInterpret concerns and design a fair responsePDFCapacity matrixBlank rating boxes, notes, and resource links

Download the offline webdeck · Slides and notes work offline; linked online labs need an internet connection.

Quick references as online images
Prompt & rubric quick referencePrompt & rubricProtected workflow quick referenceProtected workflowFair applicant AI use quick referenceFair applicant AI useCapacity matrix · page 1 quick referenceCapacity matrix · page 1Capacity matrix · page 2 quick referenceCapacity matrix · page 2Capacity matrix · page 3 quick referenceCapacity matrix · page 3
Browse all 26 individual slide images
Trust, Transparency, and AI01. Trust, Transparency, and AIThree things to take home02. Three things to take homePeople make the decisions03. People make the decisionsWhere are you today?04. Where are you today?Give the AI a clear job05. Give the AI a clear jobRemove the guesswork06. Remove the guessworkActivity: improve your request07. Activity: improve your requestMeet our practice applicant08. Meet our practice applicantDemo: organize, then check09. Demo: organize, then checkWhat can we support?10. What can we support?Activity: check one row11. Activity: check one rowUse the same scoring guide12. Use the same scoring guideCompare your reasons first13. Compare your reasons firstDemo: compare the AI draft14. Demo: compare the AI draftBefore using real information15. Before using real informationActivity: name the checkpoints16. Activity: name the checkpointsA detector flag is not proof17. A detector flag is not proofSmall error rates affect people18. Small error rates affect peopleMake the rules clear before people apply19. Make the rules clear before people applyActivity: ask without assuming20. Activity: ask without assumingChoose a skill to work on21. Choose a skill to work onActivity: mark, choose, and plan22. Activity: mark, choose, and planTry one small change this month23. Try one small change this monthWhat will you take back?24. What will you take back?Keep the materials close25. Keep the materials closeSources and scope26. Sources and scope

Read the slide text and speaker notes

Sources, interpretation, and reuse

Reviewed September 24, 2026. Recheck product guidance before the October workshop. The packet, rubric, policy starter, and capacity matrix are workshop teaching tools, not validated selection instruments or official NSPA policy.

All examples are fictional. Use an organization-approved workflow before processing any real applicant data. Policy language needs local review. Generated artwork supports the slides; all instructional wording is separately typeset.